Local small shops can't do that, so ads promotes way more coca cola than organic carrots.īesides, the people publishing ads have an agenda that almost never align with the customers interest. If you can throw a lot of money to ads, you can gain on the competition. Worse, ads create a huge asymmetry of power in the favor of those who already have it. If they don't, it means it didn't have real value. A content can't exist without it? Ask people to pay. I'm for the total and complete ban of ads. They pay to see it with ads, because it's a price they don't pay consciously, nor can they assess the consequences clearly. If ads were not here, most junk content in the internet would not exist because people would not pay 20 cents to see it. Even then, it's debatable to what extent any VPN service isn't snake oil.Įven subtitle ads break your focus from the content, give bad incentives, unfair leverage, etc. Maybe if money spent on Mozilla VPN clearly went to making Firefox better, more developer friendly, and more prolific, then it would be a somewhat different story, but whether that is actually the case isn't obvious. If Google stopped giving money to the Mozilla foundation, lots of people would be laid off, Firefox would go into a tailspin, and they'd be left with a VPN service nobody really wanted. They're not well managed, and they pretty much only exist in their current form because Google needs them to exist. These are all facts you can look up easily. being against gay marriage? Do they really need to be blogging about political activism that has nothing to do with the web? Why then has Mozilla not done anything meaningful to course correct? Why do their executives of a non-profit foundation still get raises when their core product is losing? (to be fair they don't make much compared to for-profit salaries) Why are they more interested in selling other products in a space where there's already massive competition, and using Udemy's pricing trickery to convince you that you're getting a good deal? Why did they abandon Servo? Why did they integrate a commercial service, Pocket, into Firefox and make it opt-out? Did they really need to make Brendon Eich leave because he committed the deadly sin of. The market share of Firefox has been declining rapidly for years, and Firefox is the product everyone knows Mozilla for. The text input I'm typing this in is being rendered by Firefox.Īs far as specifics go, Mozilla can hardly be considered well managed by any objective sense. Mozilla owns Firefox, but Mozilla is not Firefox. Finally after years of ignoring macOS Firefox feels more at home and the UI changes make it much more pleasant to use. > What specifically do you disagree with? I actually feel the opposite way. I don't owe anyone actionable criticism or evidence to backup my sentiment. The core of my statement is that Firefox has qualities that make me want to continue using it despite how I disagree with how Mozilla operates. This is a discussion forum, not an academic debate. If you use DDG, you have no need to visit just to search all the SE sites just !se in front of your search terms. Maybe DuckDuckGo has a shortcut for it? Hey, yes it does: !se It could bother me a bit if I were interested in browsing the hot questions, rather than search. So if I dismiss that box, no useful content moves up to occupy that space. Basically nothing other than that toolbar is useful, and that toolbar could just be a tiny browser extension or something. The dismissible block is not actually at the top it's below the "search all sites" toolbar, and below that block there isn't any particularly useful content, just "hot questions" and a sidebar of "featured sites". I guess it doesn't bother me because I've never found that site useful to begin with. You can close this with the X in the top right corner. Here's how:", with a bunch of content, and a button. Well, the main "" has a dialog-box-like element titled "StackExchange Q&A Communities are Different. I didn't manually block anything from these sites, but don't see any annoying block near the top. Sorry, what exactly is this "top block thing", on which StackExchange site? *HTML code of "Includes paid promotion" overlay: You can either rely on detecting aforementioned Google overlay* or sponsored hashtag. The overlay leads to īoth "Includes paid promotion" overlay* and "#sponsored" hashtag can be detected and therefore the video could've been skipped or hidden by some extension or by uBlock Origin filter. YouTube adds an overlay* in the upper left corner which says "Includes paid promotion". For example take a look at this sponsored video:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |